​​THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY'S
"CRACK AND SPLATTER"
​METHOD OF ASSASSINATION

     ​Select a page from the menu below. Left-click the button until the page name turns magenta color. Then scroll under the buttons to find a new page.​​ 

​

ON CELL PHONES MENU MIGHT BE LOCATED BY SELECTING A SMALL SYMBOL, SUCH AS A SMALL SQUARE WITH HORIZONTAL LINES, RATHER THAN SEPARATE MENU BUTTONS AS ON A COMPUTER SCREEN​

​deanrichardkibbe.com

TOP SECRET (See also: deanrichardkibbe.net, deanrichardkibbe.biz; and, saintvibiana.com)

SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE GENERAL STRIKE AND THE BAN ON ALL WAR...

BOYCOTT NEW CARS

​​​     ​The CIA's "crack and splatter" method of assassination,
used to murder U.S. Marines assigned to the "Combined Action
Program" in viet Nam, can be compared, in some ways, to the "smash
and grab" method of robbery. In "smash and grab", a hard object
is used to break glass, such as a glass car window or a glass
display case in a jewelry store. Then the robber is free to
reach in and grab the target previously protected by the glass
enclosure. If a lead pipe was used to smash the glass, the
velocities reached by propulsion from the intentionally hard
force of the human arm would be sufficient to cause the glass
to shatter into large enough pieces for the robber to reach in
and grab the target. If, however, the same lead pipe was fired
out of some type of cannon at a high enough velocity, the pipe
might shoot through said glass, leaving only a hole slightly
larger than the diameter of the pipe. If the objective was
only to propel the lead pipe through the glass and out the
other side, the higher speed might be suitable. If, however, the
objective was to remove the glass, as a barrier to the "grab",
a speed closer to natural human velocity capability might
better allow energy time to be dissipated laterally through
the glass, as the pipe passes through it, rather than using
inertia to propel the force through the glass with a higher
percentage of energy dissipated in a forward direction.
Different types of "glass", such as ordinary window glass,
safety-plate car windows, or plexiglass, would each have their
own characteristics for "smashing". In the ClA's "crack and splatter" method of assassination, a relatively larger bore, lower velocity, less explosive type of round, the fracture round(s), is fired into the target skull first. This enters the skull at just the right combination of speed, shape, density, and other combination of ballistic characteristics to penetrate the skull, leaving an entrance hole slightly larger than the diameter of said projectile, and fracturing the skull plate, which is now held together by the scalp of the target
skull, into various cracks, where the fracture round(s), now having
dissipated most of its kinetic energy into cracking the bony
plate of the skull, like cracking an egg, or scoring a brick or a
piece of glass, lodges in the soft tissue of the brain. Then,
immediately after the firing of the fracture round(s), a
relatively smaller bore, higher velocity, more impact explosive
type of round, the dispersion round(s), is fired into the target
skull. This enters the scored, target skull, shattering into
many smaller fragments, where the explosive impact reaction
force splatters the soft tissue of the brain through sections
of the skull previously scored by the fracture round(s),
ripping away the scalp tissue holding the cracked edges of
the bony scalp plate, as the soft brain tissue, scalp and skull
plate sections, and possibly the lodged fracture round(s) are
blown out of the target's head. This type of fire pattern has
no practical use in legitimate ground combat. It is useful
only for a carefully planned assassination, where the position or
range of positions of the target skull can be pre-arranged
and/or otherwise pre-determined. The objective is to make
death as certain as possible, with as few rounds, and least
noticeable damage to the surrounding environment and/or persons,
as possible. Since people sometimes survive brain penetration
of various types, knives, metal rods, etc. imbedded through the
brain, the parameters of said fire pattern are set to blow out
as much of the brains of the target skull as possible.
     A successful example of the CIA's "crack and splatter"
method is the JFK assassination. Although I had no part in
planning and/or carrying out the JFK murder, and have not
studied said case as extensively as many persons and agencies
have, with the limited information I have about said case I
will suggest a possible scenario, with the accuracy of the actual
event depending on a certain number of unknown, (by myself),
factors; although, regardless of the probable variation from
the actual event in some aspects, the basic method and objective
is the same; and, only the Central intelligence Agency had
motive, method, and opportunity for said JFK assassination.
     The location in Dallas is decided on as the site to set
up the shooting gallery. The building kiddy-corner from the
book depository is decided on as one of the firing lines for
the shot(s). After the limo turns the corner, the target skull
would be traveling in a direction which would cause little
variation in windage after the target skull is sighted in for
point of aim/point of impact. A firing position on the second
floor would allow the round(s) to clear the crowd while keeping
elevation variations to a minimum. The CIA would have to get
covert controlling interest, financially, legally, and/or
functionally, of the building, to prevent interference and/or
discovery during the shooting. That might require numerous
covers and cover stories. That would depend on manipulation
logistics; and, thus, would be a separate aspect not necessarily
relevant to the "crack and splatter" firing pattern. A window
facing the general direction of travel of the limo after it
turned the corner would only have to be open several inches to
allow sighting in of the target skull and clearance of the
round through the open portion of the window as long as the
window could be opened or closed with sufficient ease to
prevent malfunction. A rigid mount would be used for stability
of the sight picture. The firing position would be back far
enough away from the window to prevent easy observation by the
crowd. The height of the mount would be set to allow sighting in on the target skull when it is within the range of positions selected for time of impact. An optical sight would be used. At that range, an optical sight would be within effective range of accuracy for the desired shot. Sighting methods using any type of electrical and/or electronic component would add an unnecessary elevated risk of malfunction. The rigid mount would have to be designed to be user friendly for the range of positions for sighting in. That might require an A-gunner to help adjust the mount smoothly as the limo progressed toward the point of firing and then keep the sight picture up to the time of firing of the fracture round(s). The exact function of shooter and/or A-gunner would depend on the specific design of the mount, firing machine, and any other mechanism(s) used to control the firing of the fracture round(s). For the dispersion round(s), a firing position would be set up at a point which, if pointed to by a person seated in the rear seat, to the far right, of the limo, would be forward and to the right of the limo. The trajectory would have to clear any fences, vegetation, crowd, and/or any other mass, over, under, around, or through, on the way to impact with the target skull. Since the angle of fire, for an effective field
of fire, for the traveling dispersion round(s), would cause an
apparently larger variation in windage for sighting in on the
target skull, a smaller magnification would be used, if optical
sights were chosen, to compensate for that factor. However,
although the timing of the release of the dispersion round(s)
would be more critical than the release of the fracture round(s),
for factors of accuracy, due to the lower windage variation of
the latter, the fracture round(s) would need to make first impact on the target skull. Therefore, the sighting for the dispersion round(s) might be a timing mark, for release of a type of coded radio signal which would fire a radio-controlled, solenoid-operated, trigger mechanism to fire the fracture round(s), since the mount for the fracture round(s) would be adjusted for the target skull trajectory at the time of remote
firing of said solenoid operated trigger mechanism. A solenoid-operated trigger mechanism could be used to fire the dispersion round(s) with the same coded radio signal, with a sufficient lag time electronically designed into the trigger mechanism of the dispersion round(s) to allow the fracture round(s) to crack the target skull just prior to the dispersion rounds blowing the brains, skull and scalp fragments, and/or any fracture round(s) lodged in the brain, out of the target skull. A lead time could be built into the sighting mechanisms and/or methods, to compensate for the necessary lag time between time
of impact for the fracture round(s) and time of impact for the dispersion round(s). Because the shooter, A-gunner, and/or any
spotters and/or other personnel handling the release of the
fracture round(s), as well as the rigid mount, firing machine,
and/or other related equipment would be inside the room on the
second floor of the building kiddy-corner from the book depository,
and hidden from easy view by the crowd, as well as the factor of
a lower apparent variation of windage, after the firing machine
is sighted in on the target skull, a high degree of accuracy
could be programmed for the fracture round(s). Therefore, only
one fracture round would need to be fired to accomplish the
objective of blowing the brains out of the target skull. Because the dispersion round(s) would be released from a firing position which would have a higher probability of being viewed bv the crowd, which would increase the difficulty of concealing and/or camouflaging any mounting, firing, sighting, and/or triggering mechanism(s) and/or personnel, as well as the higher apparent windage variation as a result of the angle of fire for the dispersion round(s), a less positive degree of certainty of accuracy would be probable, all other factors being
equal, for the release of the dispersion round(s). As a result of those factors, more than one round might be fired for the dispersion round(s), as supporting fire to increase probability of impact for the dispersion round(s), though not necessarily using the same firing position, and/or mounting, firing, sighting, and/or triggering mechanism(s) and/or personnel as the first firing dispersion round(s), which would be given priority for sequencing order of impact between fracture round(s) and dispersion round(s). If support fire was used for the dispersion round(s), it would require limitation to as few round(s) as practical to prevent the appearance of too well calculated of an ambush to pass for a civilian ambush. When the target skull reached the pre-determined position within the calculated range of positions, the release of the first (fracture) round(s) would be triggered, whereupon the round(s) would impact on the back of the target skull, leaving a slightly larger than bullet size opening in the back of the skull, along with numerous cracks in the skull, which would then be held together by the scalp of the target skull, and the fracture round(s) would then lodge in the brain or be deflected through other soft tissue. The primary dispersion round(s) would then enter the right temple of the target skull, in the
soft area just behind the right eye, where the dispersion round(s)
would fragment into multiple irregular opaque metallic foreign
bodies varying in size from minute flecks of metallic debris
up to linear fragment(s) 3x1 mm. in size, dispersing in trajectory
in multiple directions within the soft brain tissue, with a
resultant of blowing the brains, skull and scalp fragments,
and/or any fracture round(s) lodged in the brain, out of the
target skull, causing certain death of the now assassinated person,
a highly efficient variation of an L-shaped ambush. Any support
fire to increase probability of impact of the dispersion round(s)
would have a degree of accuracy, trajectory, point of impact and/or
other parameter factors depending on the specific design of the
program for that field of fire. The only reason more than two rounds might be required for said assassination is that the target skull was a moving target, traveling in a limo of undeterminable exact speed at time of aim/time of impact.
     An unsuccessful example of the CIA's "crack and splatter" method is the tight group of rounds ****************** at CAP *-*-* when the Central Intelligence Agency tried to blow the brains out of a "CAP" marine *******************, using said "crack and splatter" method. The set up of the target skull was simple and routine. The results in that particular case was not. One night off ambush duty, said target "CAP"
marine was assigned to alternate bunker watch with another American who used the alias "Alphabet". There was a cot on one side of the bunker for sleeping while it was the other person's turn on watch. This night, however, the cot had been purposely ripped so bad that it was impossible to sleep on, so that said target "CAP" marine would try, when it was his turn to sleep, to use the regular bottom floor to sleep. The bunkers in the "CAP" units had an unusual feature that was different from guard bunkers at the rifle company command posts; that is, there was an elevated floor on one side reaching nearly to the top of the bunker. All of the bunkers in the "CAP" units had been uniformly designed with an elevated floor so that "CAP" marines who were used to
perform legitimate combat duties could be set up for a kill; and
then, after they were murdered, labeled as killed in action to keep
the assassination, psychological operation, and intelligence
gathering covers and activities of the Central Intelligence Agency through "CAP" a secret from the people back in the states. Although it had no military value, even being a hindrance, since it took up space that could have been used for ammo, weapons, and/or personnel, target "CAP" marines did not dwell on thinking about it, especially since all of the bunkers in the "CAP" units were uniformly built in the same form. Since said target "CAP" marine couldn't sleep on the cot, when it was his turn to sleep, because it was suddenly ripped so bad, he tried to sleep on the floor. Bait and/or other methods were used to lure cockroaches
into inhabiting the regular bottom floor of the bunker, instead of the closed type ammo bunkers. Since the target couldn't sleep on the floor with roaches crawling all over his body, he would have no place left in the guard bunker to sleep except the elevated floor, which is where he would choose to sleep. Said elevated floor should have been theoretically safe, since the bunker was on a hill; and, any enemy fire from outside the perimeter would be uphill and would at the most strike the inside roof of the bunker instead of the target "CAP" marine. Although anybody firing from the center of the "CAP" compound, where the "squad leader's" quarters were, would be able to strike the target
"CAP" marine with a bullet or bullets, it should have been theoretically safe from that direction because the target "CAP" marine would not expect to be shot at by those who are supposed to be on the same side that said target "CAP" marines had volunteered to fight for. Since it had been plotted, planned, and very elaborately pre-meditated ahead of time, all the CIA had to do was adjust the windage on the sights of the weapons they were using, after mounting the weapons in a pre-determined position, so the rounds would impact according to the particular sandbag the target skull was resting on as their body laid on the elevated floor, and then squeeze the trigger of their weapons,
causing the head of the victim to be destroyed upon impact. Through what would be called by some a freak accident, and by others at least a minor miracle, the above-stated target "CAP" marine, an exception to what would usually be classified as a perfect crime, managed to survive his turn to be slaughtered in said manner. Between the time of aim and time of impact, the target skull dropped to the left, causing the rounds to pass by the spot where the target skull had been positioned and strike the target "CAP" marine in the right calf instead. The fracture
round(s) entered the target "CAP" marine's leg first; and, after impacting at the fibula bone, absorbed the impact force of the dispersion round(s) following, thus acting, in effect, as a shield, and preventing the dispersion round(s) from tearing the target "CAP" marine's right leg off to the knee, as would have been the case if the dispersion round(s) would have been the first round(s) to strike the target "CAP" marine's unprotected limb. How the above-stated target "CAP" marine got out of CAP *-*-* alive, and eventually made it back to the states is a matter of
circumstantial logistics, and is not necessarily relevant to the
"crack and splatter" firing pattern described above.

​

             A QUOTE FROM THE INTERNET:

     "Of the 5,000 Marines/Corpsmen who served in CAP,

the best estimate we have heard is that fewer than

2,500 of us survived."