ON CELL PHONES MENU MIGHT BE LOCATED BY SELECTING A SMALL SYMBOL, SUCH AS A SMALL SQUARE WITH HORIZONTAL LINES, RATHER THAN SEPARATE MENU BUTTONS AS ON A COMPUTER SCREEN​

     ​Select a page from the menu below. Left-click the button until the page name turns magenta color. Then scroll under the buttons to find a new page.​​ 

​deanrichardkibbe.com

TOP SECRET (See also: deanrichardkibbe.net, deanrichardkibbe.biz; and, saintvibiana.com)

SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE GENERAL STRIKE AND THE BAN ON ALL WAR...

BOYCOTT NEW CARS

​

​​​​​

The CIA's "crack and splatter" method of assassination,
used to murder U.S. Marines assigned to the "Combined Action
Program" in viet Nam,can be compared,in some ways,to the "smash
and grab" method of robbery. In "smash and grab",a hard object
is used to break glass,such as a glass car window or a glass
display case in a jewelry store. Then the robber is free to
reach in and grab the target previously protected by the glass
enclosure. If a lead pipe was used to smash the glass,the
velocities reached by propulsion from the intentionally hard
force of the human arm would be sufficient to cause the glass
to shatter into large enough pieces for the robber to reach in
and grab the target. If,however,the same lead pipe was fired
out of some type of cannon at a high enough velocity,the pipe
might shoot through said glass,leaving only a hole slightly
larger than the diameter of the pipe. If the objective was
only to propel the lead pipe through the glass and out the
other side,the higher speed might be suitable. If,however,the
objective was to remove the glass,as a barrier to the "grab",
a speed closer to natural human velocity capability might
better allow energy time to be dissipated laterally through
the glass,as the pipe passes through it,rather than using
inertia to propel the force through the glass with a higher
percentage of energy dissipated in a forward direction.
Different types of "glass",such as ordinary window glass,

safety-plate car windows,or plexiglass,would each have their
own characteristics for "smashing".

In the ClA's "crack and splatter" method of assassination,
a relatively larger bore,lower velocity,less explosive type of
round,the fracture round(s),is fired into the target skull first.
This enters the skull at just the right combination of speed,
shape,density,and other combination of ballistic characteristics
to penetrate the skull,leaving an entrance hole slightly larger
than the diameter of said projectile,and fracturing the skull
plate,which is now held together by the scalp of the target
skull,into various cracks,where the fracture round(s),now having
dissipated most of its kinetic energy into cracking the bony
plate of the skull,like cracking an egg,or scoring a brick or a
piece of glass,lodges in the soft tissue of the brain. Then,
immediately after the firing of the fracture round(s),a
relatively smaller bore,higher velocity,more impact explosive
type of round,the dispersion round(s),is fired into the target
skull. This enters the scored, target skull,shattering into
many smaller fragments,where the explosive impact reaction
force splatters the soft tissue of the brain through sections
of the skull previously scored by the fracture round(s),
ripping away the scalp tissue holding the cracked edges of
the bony scalp plate,as the soft brain tissue,scalp and skull
plate sections,and possibly the lodged fracture round(s) are
blown out of the target's head. This type of fire pattern has
no practical use in legitimate ground combat. It is useful

only for a carefully planned assassination,where the position or
range of positions of the target skull can be pre-arranged
and/or otherwise pre-determined. The objective is to make
death as certain as possible,with as few rounds,and least
noticeable damage to the surrounding environment and/or persons,
as possible. Since people sometimes survive brain penetration
of various types,knives,metal rods,etc. imbedded through the
brain,the parameters of said fire pattern are set to blow out
as much of the brains of the target skull as possible.

A successful example of the CIA's "crack and splatter"
method is the JFK assassination. Although I had no part in
planning and/or carrying out the JFK murder,and have not
studied said case as extensively as many persons and agencies
have,with the limited information I have about said case I
will suggest a possible scenario,with the accuracy of the actual
event depending on a certain number of unknown(by myself)
factors;although, regardless of the probable variation from
the actual event in some aspects,the basic method and objective
is the same;and,only the Central intelligence Agency had
motive,method,and opportunity for said JFK assassination.

The location in Dallas is decided on as the site to set
up the shooting gallery. The building kiddy-corner from the
book depository is decided on as one of the firing lines for
the shot(s). After the limo turns the corner,the target skull
would be traveling in a direction which would cause little
variation in windage after the target skull is sighted in for

point of aim/point of impact. A firing position on the second

floor would allow the round(s) to clear the crowd while keeping

elevation variations to a minimum. The CIA would have to get

covert controlling interest, financially,legally,and/or

functionally,of the building,to prevent interference and/or

discovery during the shooting. That might require numerous

covers and cover stories. That would depend on manipulation

logistics;and,thus,would be a separate aspect not necessarily

relevant to the "crack and splatter" firing pattern. A window

facing the general direction of travel of the limo after it

turned the corner would only have to be open several inches to

allow sighting in of the target skull and clearance of the

round through the open portion of the window as long as the

window could be opened or closed with sufficient ease to

prevent malfunction. A rigid mount would be used for stability

of the sight picture. The firing position would be back far

enough away from the window to prevent easy observation by the

crowd. The height of the mount would be set to allow sighting

in on the target skull when it is within the range of positions

selected for time of impact. An optical sight would be used.

At that range,an optical sight would be within effective range

of accuracy for the desired shot. Sighting methods using any

type of electrical and/or electronic component would add an

unnecessary elevated risk of malfunction. The rigid mount would

have to be designed to be user friendly for the range of positions for

sighting in. That might require an A-gunner to

help adjust the mount smoothly as the limo progressed toward the
point of firing,and then keep the sight picture up to the time
of firing of the fracture round(s). The exact function of
shooter and/or A-gunner would depend on the specific design of
the mount,firing machine,and any other mechanism(s) used to
control the firing of the fracture round(s).

For the dispersion round(s),a firing position would be
set up at a point which,if pointed to by a person seated in
the rear seat,to the far right,of the limo,would be forward
and to the right of the limo. The trajectory would have to
clear any fences,vegetation,crowd,and/or any other mass,
over,under,around,or through,on the way to impact with the
target skull. Since the angle of fire,for an effective field
of fire,for the traveling dispersion round(s),would cause an
apparently larger variation in windage for sighting in on the
target skull,a smaller magnification would be used,if optical
sights were chosen,to compensate for that factor. However,
although the timing of the release of the dispersion round(s)
would be more critical than the release of the fracture round(s),
for factors of accuracy,due to the lower windage variation of
the latter,the fracture round(s) would need to make first
impact on the target skull. Therefore,the sighting for the
dispersion round(s) might be a timing mark,for release of a
type of coded radio signal which would fire a radio-controlled,
solenoid-operated,trigger mechanism to fire the fracture
round(s),since the mount for the fracture round(s) would be

adjusted for the target skull trajectory at the time of remote
firing of said solenoid operated trigger mechanism. A
solenoid-operated trigger mechanism could be used to fire the
dispersion round(s) with the same coded radio signal,with a
sufficient lag time electronically designed into the trigger
mechanism of the dispersion round(s) to allow the fracture
round(s) to crack the target skull just prior to the dispersion
rounds blowing the brains,skull and scalp fragments,and/or any
fracture round(s) lodged in the brain,out of the target skull.
A lead time could be built into the sighting mechanisms and/or
methods,to compensate for the necessary lag time between time
of impact for the fracture round(s) and time of impact for the
dispersion round(s). Because the shooter,A-gunner,and/or any
spotters and/or other personnel handling the release of the
fracture round(s),as well as the rigid mount,firing machine,
and/or other related equipment would be inside the room on the
second floor of the building kiddy-corner from the book depository,
and hidden from easy view by the crowd,as well as the factor of
a lower apparent variation of windage,after the firing machine
is sighted in on the target skull,a high degree of accuracy
could be programmed for the fracture round(s). Therefore,only
one fracture round would need to be fired to accomplish the
objective of blowing the brains out of the target skull.
Because the dispersion round(s) would be released from a
firing position which would have a higher probability of being
viewed bv the crowd,which would increase the difficulty of

concealing and/or camouflaging any mounting,firing,sighting,
and/or triggering mechanism(s) and/or personnel,as well as the
higher apparent windage variation as a result of the angle of
fire for the dispersion round(s),a less positive degree of
certainty of accuracy would be probable,all other factors being
equal,for the release of the dispersion round(s). As a result
of those factors,more than one round might be fired for the
dispersion round(s),as supporting fire to increase probability
of impact for the dispersion round(s),though not necessarily
using the same firing position,and/or mounting,firing,sighting,
and/or triggering mechanism(s) and/or personnel as the first
firing dispersion round(s),which would be given priority for
sequencing order of impact between fracture round(s) and
dispersion round(s). If support fire was used for the dispersion
round(s),it would require limitation to as few round(s) as
practical to prevent the appearance of too well calculated of
an ambush to pass for a civilian ambush.

When the target skull reached the pre-determined position
within the calculated range of positions,the release of the
first (fracture) round(s) would be triggered,whereupon the
round(s) would impact on the back of the target skull,leaving
a slightly larger than bullet size opening in the back of the
skull,along with numerous cracks in the skull,which would then
be held together by the scalp of the target skull,and the
fracture round(s) would then lodge in the brain or be deflected
through other soft tissue. The primary dispersion round(s)

would then enter the right temple of the target skull,in the
soft area just behind the right eye,where the dispersion round(s)
would fragment into multiple irregular opaque metallic foreign
bodies varying in size from minute flecks of metallic debris
up to linear fragment(s) 3x1 mm. in size,dispersing in trajectory
in multiple directions within the soft brain tissue,with a
resultant of blowing the brains,skull and scalp fragments,
and/or any fracture round(s) lodged in the brain,out of the
target skull,causing certain death of the now assassinated person,

a highly efficient variation of an L-shaped ambush. Any support
fire to increase probability of impact of the dispersion round(s)
would have a degree of accuracy,trajectory,point of impact and/or
other parameter factors depending on the specific design of the
program for that field of fire. The only reason more than two
rounds might be required for said assassination is that the
target skull was a moving target,traveling in a limo of
undeterminable exact speed at time of aim/time of impact.

An unsuccessful example of the CIA's "crack and splatter"
method is the tight group of rounds ****************** at
CAP *-*-* when the Central Intelligence Agency tried to blow
the brains out of a "CAP" marine *******************,using
said "crack and splatter" method. The set up of the target
skull was simple and routine. The results in that particular
case was not. One night off ambush duty,said target "CAP"
marine was assigned to alternate bunker watch with another
American who used the alias "Alphabet". There was a cot on one

side of the bunker for sleeping while it was the other person's
turn on watch. This night,however,the cot had been purposely
ripped so bad that it was impossible to sleep on,so that said
target "CAP" marine would try,when it was his turn to sleep,to
use the regular bottom floor to sleep. The bunkers in the "CAP"
units had an unusual feature that was different from guard bunkers
at the rifle company command posts;that is,there was an elevated
floor on one side reaching nearly to the top of the bunker. All
of the bunkers in the "CAP" units had been uniformly designed
with an elevated floor so that "CAP" marines who were used to
perform legitimate combat duties could be set up for a kill;and
then,after they were murdered,labeled as killed in action to keep
the assassination,psychological operation,and intelligence
gathering covers and activities of the Central Intelligence
Agency through "CAP" a secret from the people back in the states.
Although it had no military value,even being a hindrance,since
it took up space that could have been used for ammo,weapons,
and/or personnel,target "CAP" marines did not dwell on thinking
about it,especially since all of the bunkers in the "CAP" units
were uniformly built in the same form. Since said target "CAP"
marine couldn't sleep on the cot,when it was his turn to sleep,
because it was suddenly ripped so bad,he tried to sleep on the
floor. Bait and/or other methods were used to lure cockroaches
into inhabiting the regular bottom floor of the bunker,instead
of the closed type ammo bunkers. Since the target couldn't
sleep on the floor with roaches crawling all over his body,he

would have no place left in the guard bunker to sleep except the
elevated floor,which is where he would choose to sleep. Said
elevated floor should have been theoretically safe,since the
bunker was on a hill;and,any enemy fire from outside the perimeter
would be uphill and would at the most strike the inside roof of
the bunker instead of the target "CAP" marine. Although anybody
firing from the center of the "CAP" compound,where the "squad
leader's" quarters were,would be able to strike the target
"CAP" marine with a bullet or bullets,it should have been
theoretically safe from that direction because the target "CAP"
marine would not expect to be shot at by those who are supposed
to be on the same side that said target "CAP" marines had
volunteered to fight for. Since it had been plotted,planned,
and very elaborately pre-meditated ahead of time,all the CIA
had to do was adjust the windage on the sights of the weapons
they were using,after mounting the weapons in a pre-determined
position,so the rounds would impact according to the particular
sandbag the target skull was resting on as their body laid on
the elevated floor,and then squeeze the trigger of their weapons,
causing the head of the victim to be destroyed upon impact.
Through what would be called by some a freak accident,and by
others at least a minor miracle,the above-stated target "CAP"
marine,an exception to what would usually be classified as a
perfect crime,managed to survive his turn to be slaughtered in
said manner. Between the time of aim and time of impact,the
target skull dropped to the left,causing the rounds to pass by

the spot where the target skull had been positioned and strike
the target "CAP" marine in the right calf instead. The fracture
round(s) entered the target "CAP" marine's leg first;and,after
impacting at the fibula bone,absorbed the impact force of the
dispersion round(s) following,thus acting,in effect,as a shield,
and preventing the dispersion round(s) from tearing the target
"CAP" marine's right leg off to the knee,as would have been the
case if the dispersion round(s) would have been the first
round(s) to strike the target "CAP" marine's unprotected limb.
How the above-stated target "CAP" marine got out of CAP *-*-*
alive,and eventually made it back to the states is a matter of
circumstantial logistics,and is not necessarily relevant to the
"crack and splatter" firing pattern described above.

            A QUOTE FROM THE INTERNET:

     "Of the 5,000 Marines/Corpsmen who served in CAP,

the best estimate we have heard is that fewer than 2,500

​of us survived."

​

​

​​THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY'S

"CRACK AND SPLATTER"

​METHOD OF ASSASSINATION

​