​deanrichardkibbe.com

TOP SECRET (See also: deanrichardkibbe.net, deanrichardkibbe.biz; and, saintvibiana.com)

SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE GENERAL STRIKE AND THE BAN ON ALL WAR...

BOYCOTT NEW CARS

deanrichardkibbe.com
       Check old pages for updates and additions
Please use spell check for death threats
If you are considered a dissident and/or immune to brainwashing, and your snail mail can not get through, it is probably being blocked by
the republican/democrat nazi party united snakes government, ("The free world")
​​It has come to my attention that the website builder I use sets supposedly non-tracking cookies of some kind, unless you set your browser to block all cookies, which I recommend.
You can delete all cookies and other data after you visit any website, which I recommend.
Files linked to buttons are stored on deanrichardkibbe.org which handles large file sizes

     I have seen allegations about the amount of data that was supposed to have been stolen from Sony, by an alleged group of person or persons, (who it is said uses the alias "Guardians of Peace" in the messages received from them by Sony) , ranging from 200 GB to 100 TB. There are sort of, which is beyond the scope of this page, 1000 GB in a TB. An ordinary laptop computer will quite often, at the time this page is first written, be able to hold about 1 TB of data in its built in storage method, such as disk drives, or, more recently, solid state drives. A fair amount of personal storage for a typical computer user. So, 100 TB, (which some sources say that "insiders" have listed as the amount of data that "Guardians of Peace" claim to have stolen, which presumably means they would have copied it in digital form, that can't be verified as to volume stolen without access to the folders the "Guardians of Peace" have copied the data to) , is a fair amount of personal storage for 100 typical computer users. Depending on the type of file, and its context, that much data could be quite a bit, if it represents text information which actually could have, in real life, a significant negative or positive effect upon being made public, or not that big of a deal if it consists of uncompressed video files which are presumably backed up and normally present in large volumes in a huge movie corporation. Of course you have to rule out a big joint publicity stunt/psychological operations scam between the movie industry, the U.S. government, all potential defense contractors in a gigantic imaginary wag the dog cyber war, (so complicated with false statistics, bogus science facts, and other games that you can't do the math alleged to be necessary for it without government "authorities" to run a monster machine as yet to be announced), and/or people who literally have worshipped the devil in secret all these years while trying to convince you that the calluses on their hands are not from shoveling bullshit, but digging up potatoes to save the Irish from famine. I mean even all ​THOSE assholes couldn't be that evil and stupid, right? With their clean cut Ted Bundy haircuts, and their "I would gladly give my life to save your little girl from a burning building; but, I'm not a hero, just doin' my job" smile, and all the money they allegedly raise for diseases and causes that still never manage to get cured, even though they promise you that they counted the money out themselves. Because, if that was the case, that would mean that they have been driven so insane by their own arrogance and evil that they couldn't foresee the consequences of what happens if the whole world figures out their little game. I mean, in order to pull it off, they would have to fool the entire universe into believing that they really planned for Christmas all along, and didn't actually plan on a later release date, after they gather the cheerleaders, and the 9/11 pompoms, and the highly publicized secret commando cyber units fighting to protect your privacy and freedom, and assure the theater owners, and moviegoers/marks, that Captain America has killed Godzilla, even though they can't show you the body because they already dumped it out at sea, somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle; but, they have hi-res digital photos of Godzilla's corpse after they got it onto the ship. But now they have one Hell of a dilemma: they either really cancel releasing the movie, forever, and lose all the brownie points they would have earned in the devil's game, or they release it at a later date, and then, everyone will see, with their eyes wide open, just who and what they really are. And, if they are the pillars of the society that you pledge allegiance to, then you better grab hold of Samson and get the Hell out of the building before it is too late. The worst they could do is kill you; but, they can't take your soul unless you let them. One of the earliest computer-related hobbies I picked up many years ago is spying on hackers. I have never been a hacker myself, just more of what you might call a casual digital observer. I have never had any interest in screwing up other people's computers, either out of curiosity to see what would happen, or as a prank for a good laugh, or out of revenge, or any other reason. Although there are a lot of people who deserve it, it is just not my nature to get revenge by committing malicious acts.Which is very fortunate for many people, because I could think up some really good ones that would fall into the "Holy shit! Can that be real?" category. But, if I did do stuff like that, I wouldn't choose the digital realm, where someone could just turn off their computer until they cooled off and thought of a solution. I would probably lean towards a more analog method, similar to, to cite a much milder hypothetical example, renting a truckload of cattle to leave a big analog surprise on their lawn, only something way more extreme. I am very satisfied with knowing that on the final half hour of judgment there will be justice to infinity, which nothing anyone can do beforehand could ever significantly compare to in magnitude and beauty. Spying on hackers, rather than being a hacker, could be compared to the difference in format of  moment, in ground combat, between a recon mission and a search and destroy mission. In the World War Two era, you had a lot more trench warfare type of combat, where both sides might know the approximate location of "the enemy", ( the enemy being whoever was on the opposing side); but, because you could take casualties worse than you might inflict casualties, and both sides tended to be well equipped in comparison to the other side in a conflict, you often would have to wait until you had a strategy, or conditions, which seemed like it might give the side you were on a probability of having a more favorable kill ratio than the enemy. In a situation where one side had an advantage in the moment, the disadvantaged side might use stealthier means, like camouflage, cover, concealment, and/or moving to a safer location. Then you could have numerous Nazi troops with an impressive array of equipment plowing through an area on a search and destroy, (sweep and clear), mission to find and kill as many of the enemy, (whoever they might be designated to be), as possible, because they were the good guys, and the other side were the enemy. That's just how the game of war is played; so, there is no such thing as cheating. During the Viet Nam era, a lot of principalities and powers had developed such an impressive array of equipment that the only way a lower budgeted group could hold their own, or have any chance of winning, was through guerrilla warfare. This meant that those who were classified as the guerrillas had to lean more towards stealthier means, rather than overwhelming firepower. All of the formats have been in use as long as there have been wars. Even if the standard operating procedure of a particular military unit on either side leaned more towards one format than another, instant changes in the immediate situation could cause the necessity to lean more towards another format, to adapt to the moment. A recon mission, often referred to as a patrol, would theoretically lean more towards search, in plan. If the patrol was planned for recon only, a unit might spot some kind of enemy movement, and hold their fire, (assuming the enemy hadn't spotted their position), and just observe. If conditions were right, they could learn more about enemy logistics, and/or other enemy movement, which could be more advantageous than just blasting away. Information could be forwarded through established "lines of communication", where, if patience was enough of a virtue, eventually all of the gathered information could be used to an advantage in a setting leaning more towards the destroy format. Of course, ground combat is a lot more complicated than that; and, search/recon and destroy are very general areas with no dividing line, but usually a type of recipe that can use different proportions of those and many other ingredients to suit the occasion. All of the military formats in combat have their purpose and are inter-dependent and inter-related. The idea of the "elite" super soldier is mostly a myth in real life. There is a limit to how dead you can kill someone. After you go through a certain level of training, it sort of becomes redundant. The ordinary rifleman, grunt, ground pounder, or whatever you want to call them, is just as deadly as any Navy Seal, U.S. Army Special Forces, Marine Recon, "CAP" or other official or unofficial named project of the moment assigned troop, and/or any other variation of warrior; and, a single bullet to the head can render the trigger finger of even the most extensively trained, aerobically healthy, and/or naturally gifted warrior totally and permanently inoperable. I never went on any patrols looking for hackers. Spying on hackers just became one of the secondary hobbies I got into after observing data I gathered through software on my computer which allowed me to trace other computers, and their users, who at various times tried to break through my firewall through various ports. All kinds of people, from all age groups, and all different lifestyles, in areas you would not even expect to find electricity, much less computers, are constantly trying to break through your firewall, over and over again, day and night, from just about everywhere in the world except Antarctica and North Korea. It is almost impossible to break through a properly maintained firewall, even by people who design the most complicated software on the planet. You don't need a computer to hack into show business companies like Sony. Just "social engineering". You just need a very thick wallet, and then you can hire some tranny to hide an eavesdropping device and/or get a pubic hair sample from Superman, and then the tranny would portray itself as the victim because an expensive pair of designer scissors broke while trying to cut through Superman's steel wool. The more I think of this, the funnier it seems. Could this have been a spelling error? Maybe they meant Cow Head, Newfoundland? It's like someone was up there with a laser pointer, laughing, and saying "North Korea! Pick North Korea!". So, what did the Super Secret Cyber Unit of the F.B.I. use to determine that the North Koreans hacked into Sony? Extended Basic on a Commodore 64? If it was just Sony in on this, maybe it would just end up later on "World's Dumbest Publicity Stunts". Or maybe Sony could issue a statement that read: "OK. It was all just bullshit. But, hey, it's Hollywood; that's what we do.", and they might end up eventually getting a standing ovation and a trophy for "Best Bullshit in a Comedy or Musical". But, when they get the F.B.I. to issue such a ridiculous claim along with an allegedly analog president, be afraid; be very afraid! Maybe the robots really have taken over. The F.B.I. arrests people for alleged crimes. And they are running around loose all over the country with guns! I remember one time when I was a little kid, I went into a carnival side show, alone, (I doubt if my dogs would have wanted to see a carnival), and one of the exhibits was a "real live mermaid", in a common ten gallon aquarium. I never had any mermaids of my own, and don't know anyone else that did. I think at that time I was more into breeding really vivid colors into Lebistes Reticulatus, which I think they later changed to Lebistes Lebistes. But, as I was watching this "real live mermaid" in a ten gallon aquarium, along with the rest of the crowd, I couldn't help noticing a circular refraction ring of color variation surrounding the mermaid, which indicated that a reduction lens was used to project the mermaid's image into the aquarium, as well as making her look small enough to fit inside of a ten gallon tank. I verbally pointed this out to the amused crowd, although the curator for this exhibit didn't seem to find it as amusing. A few seconds later, the curator announced that anyone could go behind the flap in the tent and see the mermaid in person, for one half dollar. I don't hardly think that was the carnival's original plan; but, everyone who paid the half dollar got to go back and see the mermaid for themselves. Yeah, I paid to see her, even though I already knew about Santa Claus by that time. You never know; maybe the experience might have come in useful later if I ever decided to develop some type of Guppy/Mermaid hybridization program. After I walked up a few short steps with the rest of the crowd, I walked along the wooden platform located on the side of the mermaid's trailer, and watched her in her natural habitat. The mermaid seemed very surprised when she noticed real live humans peeking through the screen windows on the side of her trailer. A brilliant save by the curator. Even though it wasn't the most exciting of moments for me, I will still always remember it fondly. And, the curator made some extra cash for the carnival, as well as probably getting a good laugh out of it later, along with the mermaid and others in the carnival. Many times in my life I have seen and heard things that people say, do, and/or believe that are very obviously, to me, completely ridiculous. Because I have a very efficient level of natural instinctive and comprehensive analytical ability, I usually let other people's ideas go in one ear and out the other. I have heard, detected, and analyzed so much bullshit in my life, some unintentional, (because the average relatively feeble-minded, though well meaning, tend to believe the Earth must be flat if everybody else thinks so), and some totally on purpose, (because the overconfident feeble-minded tend to believe that if you get enough people to repeat the same bullshit over and over it will soften other people's brains enough to make them believe it). But, claims of North Korea hacking into a movie studio for a few trivial emails, are the bullshit of bullshit, for an extreme multitude of reasons. It will set the new brown standard for bullshit. The U.S government claiming that North Korea hacked into Sony is even more ridiculous than if the DEA claimed that Mongolians on horseback are breaking into the homes of Americans to steal their weed. And I wonder; are they now going to be stupid enough to think they can pull off some type of cover up for all this? What can they cover it up with, more bullshit?                     

                2B continued... ​

HACK MY WEBSITE

deanrichardkibbe.com

(for real)

or

KISS MY ASS

(figuratively speaking)

​December 20, 2014

    If you listen to the news, at the time this page is first being posted, you might hear a story called "Sony hacking". Here it comes, from the same people that shovel it out, the newest version of "weapons of mass destruction". I say it is all a bunch of bullshit; and, I will explain why, further below on this page. But, before I give you the gory details of why you should not be afraid of any of these so-called hackers, and why you should not believe any of the bullshit they are shoveling out, including, but not limited to, the propaganda by the F.B.I., which knows plainly that they are lying through their teeth, I would just like to issue a challenge to "Guardians of Peace", "anonymous", and all of the other digital poser pussies that make big claims about things that they actually didn't do, never could do in a million years, couldn't be proved or disproved, and really are nothing to worry about, except in their dreams, and the imaginations of the media and similar disease organisms who perpetuate their myths: 

 

HACKERS MY ASS

ON CELL PHONES MENU MIGHT BE LOCATED BY SELECTING A SMALL SYMBOL, SUCH AS A SMALL SQUARE WITH HORIZONTAL LINES, RATHER THAN SEPARATE MENU BUTTONS AS ON A COMPUTER SCREEN​

     ​Select a page from the menu below. Left-click the button until the page name turns magenta color. Then scroll under the buttons to find a new page.​​